[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160607181617.GA6556@Karyakshetra>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:46:17 +0530
From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] IB/srp: Remove create_workqueue
alloc_workqueue replaces deprecated create_workqueue().
A dedicated workqueue has been used since the workqueue srp_remove_wq with
workitem &target->remove_work, is a work queue for the SRP target removal.
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has been set to ensure forward progress under memory
pressure.
Since there are only a fixed number of work items, explicit
concurrency limit is unnecessary here.
Is the workqueue being used on a memory reclaim path?
Does it require WQ_MEM_RECLAIM?
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
index 646de17..1730d1f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -3685,7 +3685,7 @@ static int __init srp_init_module(void)
indirect_sg_entries = cmd_sg_entries;
}
- srp_remove_wq = create_workqueue("srp_remove");
+ srp_remove_wq = alloc_workqueue("srp_remove", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
if (!srp_remove_wq) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists