[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3671744.A3ustGCdmM@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:50:01 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...el.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org, fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset calculation
On Monday, June 20, 2016 3:54:06 PM CEST Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 05:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > - jiffies_to_timespec(jiffies, &v0);
> > - jiffies_to_timespec(lport->boot_time, &v1);
> > - fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (v0.tv_sec - v1.tv_sec);
> > + fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (lport->boot_time - jiffies) / HZ;
>
> Does this patch introduce a 64-bit division? There might still be 32-bit
> users of this code.
No, both lport->boot_time and jiffies are 'unsigned long'.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists