lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:58:11 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...el.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"y2038@...ts.linaro.org" <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org" <fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset calculation

On 06/20/2016 04:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 3:54:06 PM CEST Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 06/17/2016 05:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> -     jiffies_to_timespec(jiffies, &v0);
>>> -     jiffies_to_timespec(lport->boot_time, &v1);
>>> -     fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (v0.tv_sec - v1.tv_sec);
>>> +     fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (lport->boot_time - jiffies) / HZ;
>>
>> Does this patch introduce a 64-bit division? There might still be 32-bit
>> users of this code.
>
> No, both lport->boot_time and jiffies are 'unsigned long'.

Ah, you're right. Hence:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ