[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57684795.8050705@metafoo.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:44:21 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.co.uk>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, peter.ujfalusi@...com,
jarkko.nikula@...mer.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ASoC: tpa6130a2: Add DAPM support
> + /* before widget power up */
> + if (SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event)) {
> + /* Turn on the chip */
> + tpa6130a2_power(data, true);
> + /* Sync the registers */
> + ret = regcache_sync(data->regmap);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(c->dev, "Failed to initialize chip\n");
> + tpa6130a2_power(data, false);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + /* after widget power down */
> + } else
> + tpa6130a2_power(data, false);
checkpatch.pl should complain about this. Kernel code style is if one branch
has branches the other has to have it as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists