[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <146799807004.73491.2602277598493203375@resonance>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 10:14:30 -0700
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>,
jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
xuwei5@...ilicon.com
Cc: guodong.xu@...aro.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
xinliang.liu@...aro.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: amba-pl011: add support for clock frequency setting via
dt
Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2016-07-08 01:11:06)
> Allow to specify the clock frequency for any given port via the
> assigned-clock-rates device tree property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index 1b7331e..51867ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -2472,6 +2473,10 @@ static int pl011_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
> if (IS_ERR(uap->clk))
> return PTR_ERR(uap->clk);
>
> + ret = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->dev.of_node, false);
Change looks good to me, but with one question: should this change be
put into more generic code instead of in this specific driver? For
instance, we call of_clk_set_defaults from the following files:
drivers/base/platform.c
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
drivers/spi/spi.c
And Stephen posted a patch to do this for devices on the AMBA bus:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6501691/
Does Stephen's patch mean that you do not need patch #1? Stephen, any
update on what happened to this patch?
Thanks,
Mike
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> uap->reg_offset = vendor->reg_offset;
> uap->vendor = vendor;
> uap->fifosize = vendor->get_fifosize(dev);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists