lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:30:28 +0200 From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> Subject: Re: staging: ks7010: Rename jump labels > I have a lot of other things to work on, of much greater interest (to me.) This is fine. Thanks for your feedback. >>> Personally I see no value in such statistics. >> >> Do they indicate any code smells eventually? > > I have no idea what you mean, sorry. How do you think about to take another look at additional views around software development methodologies? Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_smell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_metric#Common_software_measurements Do you occasionally care about a length distribution for identifiers (like goto labels) of up to 39 characters? > You keep asking more and more from me. I am looking also for further clarification based on your responses. > May I remind you this is your "project" in the first place, not mine? I invite also others to contribute to such a software evolution. > If you have no idea what should be done, I have got some ideas for changes. I am just unsure on how the corresponding acceptance will evolve. > or even whether anything should be done, then just move on to something else. This can also happen. > I have already expressed all my views on this topic I guess that related information will be reconsidered later. > and am not willing to say anything more about it. I would interpret the suggestion "CodingStyle: Clarify and complete chapter 7" in the way that your interest grew for a moment. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/25/207 https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1195846.html I am curious if you are going to contribute to the proposed improvement a bit more. Regards, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists