[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <579F59DF.7090909@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:17:03 +0100
From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
CC: mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] fs: befs: remove in vain variable assignment
On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> There is no need to init res, since it will be overwitten later by
> befs_fblock2brun().
>
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> index 6bc5b40..2b68c81 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ befs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> befs_data_stream *ds = &BEFS_I(inode)->i_data.ds;
> befs_block_run run = BAD_IADDR;
> - int res = 0;
> + int res;
> ulong disk_off;
>
> befs_debug(sb, "---> befs_get_block() for inode %lu, block %ld",
>
Looks good.
Thanks Salah,
Luis
Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
Pushed to the befs-next branch:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists