lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57AC4D83.1060305@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:03:47 +0100
From:	Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To:	Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] befs: dump inode_size superblock information

On 10/08/16 22:41, Salah Triki wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:01:23PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>> befs_dump_super_block() wasn't giving the inode_size information when
>> dumping all elements of the superblock. Add this element to have complete
>> information of the superblock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a series of superblock information related changes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Luis
>>
>>  fs/befs/debug.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/befs/debug.c b/fs/befs/debug.c
>> index 4de7cff..85c1339 100644
>> --- a/fs/befs/debug.c
>> +++ b/fs/befs/debug.c
>> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ befs_dump_super_block(const struct super_block *sb, befs_super_block * sup)
>>  
>>  	befs_debug(sb, "  num_blocks %llu", fs64_to_cpu(sb, sup->num_blocks));
>>  	befs_debug(sb, "  used_blocks %llu", fs64_to_cpu(sb, sup->used_blocks));
>> +	befs_debug(sb, "  inode_size %u", fs32_to_cpu(sb, sup->inode_size));
>>  
>>  	befs_debug(sb, "  magic2 %08x", fs32_to_cpu(sb, sup->magic2));
>>  	befs_debug(sb, "  blocks_per_ag %u",
>> -- 
>> 2.5.1
>>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
> 
> Thanx
> Salah
> 

Hi Salah,

I prefer applying this series as a set. So will wait for your review of patch 2/4.

Let me know if you don't have time for it.

Thanks for the reviews,
Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ