[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160914170452.GD5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:04:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: x86@...nel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: perf/x86: Use kmalloc_array() in merge_attr()
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:40:32PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> Would you like to suggest any more constraints for this kind of
> software refactoring?
Yes, don't do it. If you're writing new code by all means, do whatever
you feel, but don't go changing code just because checkpatch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists