[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474578224.8253.30.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:03:44 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: becher.jannik@...il.com, Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@...tmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: wlan-ng: fixed a coding style issue
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 22:52 +0200, becher.jannik@...il.com wrote:
> I always wondered why I shouldn't make more than one change in a patch,
> but in all talks I watched they said that it's easier for them to merge
> small patches.
>
> So you think I should make one "big" patch and resend it?
Make separate patches for each "type" of change.
Here it would be removing unnecessary space before all
casts in the same file or for all specific driver files.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists