linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: fix masking of pinmux functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJOFmgx3Y01DZvUU=wF68HLWRrUoiHAcOYtVjw6LsqvE3+Ds8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2016 23:36:08 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
To:     John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: fix masking of pinmux functions

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:36 AM, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org> wrote:
> The following commit introduced a regression by not properly masking the
> calculated value.
>
> commit 47a01ee9a6c39fe1 ("pinctrl: qcom: Clear all function selection bits")
>
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>

Now I'm confused how it ever worked.... but agreed, the code looks wrong.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> index 51c42d7..775c883 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
>
>         val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
> -       val &= mask;
> +       val &= ~mask;
>         val |= i << g->mux_bit;
>         writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
>