linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add dependency on OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKP5S=1Ds0-cz7qHiRbLPQj2e0fwaPXFExhRBcZ5qMkWUTaumA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:09:43 +0200
From:   Nicolae Rosia <nicolae.rosia.oss@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nicolae Rosia <Nicolae_Rosia@...tor.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add dependency on OF

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:43:35AM +0200, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
>
>> This driver was converted to device tree only,
>> add dependency on OF symbol and drop of_match_ptr
>
> These are two different changes :(
>
Ok, will send a patch only for Kconfig.

>>  config REGULATOR_TWL4030
>>       tristate "TI TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS659x0 PMIC"
>>       depends on TWL4030_CORE
>> +     depends on OF
>
> This should be OF || COMPILE_TEST so people can still get build coverage
> without DT.
>
Ok.

>> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
>> @@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static struct platform_driver twlreg_driver = {
>>        */
>>       .driver  = {
>>               .name  = "twl6030_reg",
>> -             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(twl_of_match),
>> +             .of_match_table = twl_of_match,
>
> This buys us nothing, it's not going to make any practical difference
> but on the other hand it costs nothing to have it there either.  The
> only impact I can see this having is causing someone doing a cut'n'paste
> to miss the of_match_ptr() out.
I did this because I received a comment on another patch [0].

Thanks,
Nicolae

[0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/694021/