[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY1PR21MB0071D603E8B6F6A7F820492BCB820@CY1PR21MB0071.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:17:52 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Konstantin Khlebnikov" <koct9i@...il.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 33/33] Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:50:37 -0800 Matthew Wilcox
> <mawilcox@...uxonhyperv.com> wrote:
> > include/linux/idr.h | 132 ++--
> > include/linux/radix-tree.h | 5 +-
> > init/main.c | 3 +-
> > lib/idr.c | 1078 -------------------------------
> > lib/radix-tree.c | 632 ++++++++++++++++--
>
> hm. It's just a cosmetic issue, but perhaps the idr
> wrappers-around-radix-tree code should be in a different .c file.
I can put some of them back into idr.c -- there's a couple of routines left in there still, so adding some more won't hurt.
> Before:
>
> akpm3:/usr/src/25> size lib/idr.o lib/radix-tree.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 6566 89 16 6671 1a0f lib/idr.o
> 11811 117 8 11936 2ea0 lib/radix-tree.o
>
> After:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 14151 118 8 14277 37c5 lib/radix-tree.o
>
>
> So 4500 bytes saved. Decent.
Not bad. 0day has been sending me email telling me that I saved something more like 1500 bytes, but that's on a minimal config. (also a couple of routines stayed in idr.c, so you're overstating how much I saved)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists