[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170107124930.GA1902@katana>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 13:49:31 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Jochen Eisinger <jochen@...guin-breeder.org>,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Mario_Limonciello@...l.com,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on
Dell machines
> > > > > + if (!known_i2c_address) {
> > > > > + dev_warn(&priv->pci_dev->dev,
> > > > > + "Accelerometer lis3lv02d i2c device is present "
> > > > > + "but its i2c address is unknown, skipping ...\n");
> > > >
> > > > You are probably well aware of this, but checkpatch prefers
> > > > keeping long log messages in one line. I am pointing it out
> > > > just in case.
> > >
> > > Yes, but I do not know how to fix it. Splitting message into two
> > > lines generates warning. Having long line generates warning too.
> >
> > Weird, checkpatch does not protest on my machine when the log message
> > is written on a single line...
>
> I hope that i2c maintainers decide how to format that line.
Make it one line saying "accelerometer address unknown"?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists