[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8ae1bac-90c9-3cb3-b6e0-2b2b09cc3db3@vivier.eu>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:18:31 +0100
From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@...ier.eu>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@...nadk.org>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dev@...inux.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: regression for m68k/coldfire
Le 03/02/2017 à 01:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 02/03/2017 01:10 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> This is a limitation in the FEC support in QEMU.
>> This works on real ColdFire hardware (which do support the
>> FEC MIB stats registers from offset 0x200 - so not 5272).
>> I sent this patch to the qemu dev list a couple of weeks
>> back which fixes qemu:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-01/msg01781.html
>>
>> I do not believe it has been picked up by QEMU mainline yet
>> (I will probably have to resend and push a little to get that done).
>
> QEMU upstream can sometimes take a while before they are merging patches,
> but usually it helps containing the maintainer of this part of the
> source tree directly.
>
> Unfortunately, mcf5208 is currently unmaintained [1]:
>
> mcf5208
> S: Orphan
> F: hw/m68k/mcf5208.c
> F: hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
> F: hw/char/mcf_uart.c
> F: hw/net/mcf_fec.c
>
> But you can try getting into touch with Laurent Vivier who is the
> new maintainer of the m68k target. I have CC'ed him.
>
> Adrian
>
>> [1] http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=MAINTAINERS
>
Use scripts/get_maintainer.pl on your patch to find the people.
This patch is on the network part, so you should cc:
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> (odd fixer:Network devices)
If you cc me, you add more chances to have a review ;)
Thanks,
Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists