linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86cdf195-f2af-0696-0288-3ad560bceb48@deltatee.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:56:49 -0700
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>,
        Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
        Stephen Bates <stephen.bates@...rosemi.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver



On 23/02/17 01:51 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> You'll want to be careful during the merge window (these days) as the
> maintainer is usually busy with code delivery. You can't rush your code in at
> the last minute.

Thanks for the advice, we will continue to wait.

However, I would say we've been very patient. It's been three weeks
since we posted the latest revision, a month since the first version and
almost 3 months since our RFC. I don't think it's too much to expect at
least a response saying that it's in the works or something. That long
with dead silence from the maintainer is a bit much.

Logan