linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: samsung: move the Samsung specific phy files to "samsung" directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFp+6iGj=me4uOpOy338oxiAi=0sLW4WnkCzzAMELkxp=ZmrVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:48:54 +0530
From:   Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:     Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, krzk@...nel.org,
        kamil@...as.org, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        javier@....samsung.com, inux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: samsung: move the Samsung specific phy files to
 "samsung" directory

Hi Kishon,


On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 09 March 2017 05:03 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Make the "samsung" directory and move the Samsung specific files to
>> there for maintaining the files relevant to Samsung.
>
> The number of phy drivers in drivers/phy is getting unmanageable. I think this
> is a good step to make it a little better. Can you also add a MAINTAINER for
> drivers/phy/samsung?

I remember making a similar attempt in past [1], but that time we couldn't
reach an agreement as to whether group the phy drivers based on
vendors or based on the type of phy.

If you are fine with grouping the drivers for each vendor, I hope you can
consider picking that patch (I can respin the patch based on linux-phy/next).
Other driver maintainers were also cool with that older patch.

Let me know your comments.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8762561/

Regards
Vivek

>
> Thanks
> Kishon
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/Kconfig                               | 96 +----------------------
>>  drivers/phy/Makefile                              | 14 +---
>>  drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig                       | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/phy/samsung/Makefile                      | 11 +++
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos-dp-video.c   |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos-mipi-video.c |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos-pcie.c       |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos4210-usb2.c   |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos4x12-usb2.c   |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c    |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos5250-sata.c   |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos5250-usb2.c   |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-s5pv210-usb2.c      |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-samsung-usb2.c      |  0
>>  drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-samsung-usb2.h      |  0
>>  15 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/samsung/Makefile
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos-dp-video.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos-mipi-video.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos-pcie.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos4210-usb2.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos4x12-usb2.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos5250-sata.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-exynos5250-usb2.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-s5pv210-usb2.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-samsung-usb2.c (100%)
>>  rename drivers/phy/{ => samsung}/phy-samsung-usb2.h (100%)

[snip]



-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project