linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] vfs fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzB6kv5Ai4M=2BXu9fxGbP_TZvNEG0QN5BNhPS+-XqHrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:10:19 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs fixes

Hey Al,
 mind looking at fs/namei,c line 2186:

                if (likely(!nd_jump_root(nd)))
                        return s;
                nd->root.mnt = NULL;
-->             rcu_read_unlock();   <--
                return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);

because that rcu_read_unlock() looks odd.

It looks odd because the lock part is

                if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
                        rcu_read_lock();

ie it's locked conditionally, and the code in between does not seem to
return every time LOOKUP_RCU is clear.

So mind giving this a look? Is it as obviously buggy as I think it is,
or is there something I'm missing?

              Linus