[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gnjxwBXEQ--u6Sbviks74MXLFWTfN+J90cdDZbO2Q7+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:13:24 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Lv <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...iumnetworks.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
robert.richter@...ium.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
geethasowjanya.akula@...il.com,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>, linu.cherian@...ium.com,
Charles Garcia Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Cavium ThunderX2 SMMUv3 errata workarounds
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 05:33:38PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
>> Cavium ThunderX2 SMMUv3 implementation has two Silicon Erratas.
>> 1. Errata ID #74
>> SMMU register alias Page 1 is not implemented
>> 2. Errata ID #126
>> SMMU doesnt support unique IRQ lines and also MSI for gerror,
>> eventq and cmdq-sync
>>
>> The following patchset does software workaround for these two erratas.
>>
>> This series is based on patchset.
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg578443.html
>
> Yes so it is not standalone. How are we going to merge these
> ACPI IORT/ACPICA/SMMU patches - inclusive of:
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg586458.html
>
> Rafael, do ACPICA patches go upstream via the ACPI tree pull request ?
Not as a rule.
> To remove dependency on ACPICA changes this series needs updating
> anyway and for [1] above I think the only solution is for all the
> patches to go via the ACPI tree (if ACPICA updates go upstream with it).
I think we may ask Lv to backport the header changes once they have
been merged into Linux.
Lv, would that work?
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists