[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZd=rGQy8kGEjS8pEAJ+xYpBn=JmGXDpSf3qF_P2aa6TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:16:19 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix filtering out unwanted events
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> 2017-06-29 11:33 GMT+02:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_BOTH_EDGES is not a single flag, but a binary OR of
>>> GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_RISING_EDGE and GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_FALLING_EDGE.
>>>
>>> The expression 'le->eflags & GPIOEVENT_REQUEST_BOTH_EDGES' we'll get
>>> evaluated to true even if only one event type was requested.
>>>
>>> Fix it by checking both RISING & FALLING flags explicitly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
>>
>> Patch applied for fixes.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>
> Thanks. I think this should also go to linux-stable (e.g. 4.9 LTS is
> affected). Will you forward it or should I do it myself?
I have added the stable tag so it should JustWork(TM).
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists