[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707030840440.2188@nanos>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, bhe@...hat.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] x86/apic: Prepare for unifying the interrupt
delivery modes setup
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
> At 07/03/2017 01:47 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > +/* Init the interrupt delivery mode for the BSP */
> > > +void __init apic_intr_mode_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (apic_intr_mode_select()) {
> > > + case APIC_PIC:
> > > + apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, KERN_INFO
> > > + "Keep in PIC mode(8259)\n");
> >
> > Please do not proliferate that APIC_VERBOSE, KERN_INFO mess. Clean up the
> > apic_printk() macro first. Either change printk() to pr_info() or make the
> > printk level dependent on the APIC verbosity.
>
> Oops, I understood, How about the following:
>
> pr_info("APIC: keep in PIC mode(8259)\n");
As this is once per boot, it's ok to have that information unconditionally
printed.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists