linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 02/12] clk: qcom: flag for 64 bit CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:33:21 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/12] clk: qcom: flag for 64 bit CONFIG_CTL

On 07/27, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> index 47a1da3..e6cde2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ void clk_alpha_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap,
>  	regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_L_VAL, config->l);
>  	regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_ALPHA_VAL, config->alpha);
>  	regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL, config->config_ctl_val);
> -	regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U, config->config_ctl_hi_val);
> +
> +	if (pll->flags & SUPPORTS_64BIT_CONFIG_CTL)
> +		regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U,
> +			     config->config_ctl_hi_val);

Is there a hole there? I mean a RAZ/WI register so we can just
keep writing it and not care?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project