linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3 v11] time: Make fast functions return 0 before timekeeping is initialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a2f5705-9617-6a27-2a96-8750c78fb451@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:42:19 -0400
From:   Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v11] time: Make fast functions return 0 before
 timekeeping is initialized



On 09/05/2017 08:15 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> +static struct tk_fast tk_fast_mono ____cacheline_aligned = {
>> +	.base = {
>> +		(struct tk_read_base){
>> +			.clock = &dummy_clock,
>> +		},
>> +		(struct tk_read_base){
>> +			.clock = &dummy_clock,
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +};
> 
>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1708281658370.1867@nanos
> 
> Sigh

Oof ... sorry tglx.  I missed that email :(  My apologies.  I'll fix that,
retest, and resend.

P.

> 
> 	tglx
>