linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] lightnvm: pblk: fix message if L2P MAP is in device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <89391d08-1439-76bc-3c9b-fbfd9b31131c@lightnvm.io>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:15:02 +0200
From:   Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
To:     Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io>,
        Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@...era.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] lightnvm: pblk: fix message if L2P MAP is in device

On 09/22/2017 10:52 AM, Javier González wrote:
>> On 21 Sep 2017, at 13.26, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@...era.com> wrote:
>>
>> This usually happens if we are developing with qemu and ll2pmode has
>> default value.  Even in that case message seems wrong.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@...era.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c
>> index 470ef04..c5c1337 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c
>> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static void *pblk_init(struct nvm_tgt_dev *dev, struct gendisk *tdisk,
>> 	int ret;
>>
>> 	if (dev->identity.dom & NVM_RSP_L2P) {
>> -		pr_err("pblk: device-side L2P table not supported. (%x)\n",
>> +		pr_err("pblk: device-side L2P table supported. (%x)\n",
>> 							dev->identity.dom);
>> 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> 	}
>> --
>> 2.5.0
> 
> You're right. This is inherited from rrpc.
> 
> Can we instead write "pblk: full host-side L2P table not supported"?
> People will not know about the hybrid device/host L2P as time goes by
> and it will just be confusing. I'm not even sure this will be part of
> the 2.0 spec, so it will probably go away with time...
> 
> Javier
> 
Thanks, I picked it up.