[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005044350.GA18345@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:13:50 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@...ktrobit.com>,
"4 . 3+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Add missing of_node_put(np)
On 04-10-17, 09:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 11:05 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > From: Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@...ktrobit.com>
> >
> > The for_each_available_child_of_node() loop in _of_add_opp_table_v2()
> > doesn't drop the reference to "np" on errors. Fix that.
> >
> > Fixes: 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings")
> > Cc: 4.3+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.3+
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@...ktrobit.com>
> > [ VK: Improved commit log. ]
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>
> Looks like that opp_table->np = opp_np assignment in this function needs
> to do an of_node_get() because the caller of this function puts the
> pointer unconditionally.
We only use that pointer (opp_table->np) in _managed_opp() to compare the
address. Perhaps we don't need to do a of_node_get() there.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists