[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171016193921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:50:45 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com" <qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/types.h: Restore the ability to disable sparse
endianness checks
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:36:50PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 18:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:57:35PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 16:34 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > I don't see how it'll help make things better. OTOH if the specific
> > > > drivers are tagged in the makefile, they can be gradually moved out to
> > > > staging or something to help trigger action.
> > >
> > > Do you really want to move drivers like qla2xxx to staging? That driver is
> > > important to multiple enterprise distro's.
> >
> > Frankly I'm surprised this one has sparse issues.
> > Really e.g. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.h is new from June 2017.
> >
> > It's not some ancient piece of code that no one understands so
> > we are afraid to touch it.
>
> Sorry if I wasn't clear enough but I wasn't referring to the qla2xxx NVMe
> code. I was referring to the qla2xxx FC initiator code. I think that code
> went upstream in January 2004. See also
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/log/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx?ofs=100
>
> Bart.
Right but qla_nvme also triggers these warnings. That's the problem with
disabling them tree-wide. To me it looks like the time we are spending
arguing about work-arounds would be better spent just fixing the
majority of the code. If a couple of places aren't clean and
need more thought, that's not a big deal.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists