[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyBT0xF8Exn21Mb37e_e1f+DqvuZC94qY8SY=ScsvPHG+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:55:00 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tanxiaofei@...wei.com, guohanjun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix NULL pointer dereference
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com> wrote:
> When queue_work() is used in irq handler, there is a potential
> case that trigger NULL pointer dereference.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> worker_thread()
> |-spin_lock_irq()
> |-process_one_work()
> |-worker->current_pwq = pwq
> |-spin_unlock_irq()
> |-worker->current_func(work)
> |-spin_lock_irq()
> |-worker->current_pwq = NULL
> |-spin_unlock_irq()
>
> //interrupt here
> |-irq_handler
> |-__queue_work()
> //assuming that the wq is draining
> |-is_chained_work(wq)
> |-current_wq_worker()
> //Here, 'current' is the interrupted worker!
> |-current->current_pwq is NULL here!
I remember that softirq can be invoked when irq_eixt(),
and in this case the current->current_pwq is also NULL
if __queue_work() is called in the soft irq.
So in_task() might be better than !in_irq() for the fix?
> |-schedule()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Avoid it by checking for irq context in current_wq_worker(), and
> if in irq context, we shouldn't use the 'current' to check the
> condition.
>
> Reported-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue_internal.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
> index 8635417..d81cb9b 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/preempt.h>
>
> struct worker_pool;
>
> @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ struct worker {
> */
> static inline struct worker *current_wq_worker(void)
> {
> - if (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
> + if (!in_irq() && (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER))
> return kthread_data(current);
> return NULL;
> }
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists