[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3CE2B08B-07F4-411D-B87A-18F586F5534C@cavium.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:16:39 +0000
From: "Madhani, Himanshu" <Himanshu.Madhani@...ium.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
CC: "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
Hi Bart,
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 18:03 +0000, Madhani, Himanshu wrote:
>> On Oct 31, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list
>>>> pointer to all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup()
>>>> and from_timer() to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>>
>>> Cavium folks: Please verify!
>>
>> I’ve checked on my setup and i am seeing regression with this patch applied.
>>
>> Driver load locks up the system with this patch applied.
>>
>> NACK
>
> That feedback is not very helpful …
>
Here’s my setup details
4.14.0-rc7 + scsi_misc-4.15 qla2xxx patches from Martin’s tree + current patch.
System has 3 adapters 8G/16G/32G.
> Anyway, what kernel source tree did you use in your testing? I may be able to
> free up some time to look into this myself.
>
> Bart.
Thanks,
- Himanshu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists