lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXv3VxEdr1UOjWW9GTFTd_BoUCpThxOxz7a4-YC+d_i=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:44:39 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at,
        Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
        michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, richard.fellner@...dent.tugraz.at,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/30] x86, kaiser: only populate shadow page tables for userspace

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 12:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> +                     */
>>> +                    native_get_shadow_pgd(pgdp)->pgd = pgd.pgd;
>>> +                    /*
>>> +                     * For the copy of the pgd that the kernel
>>> +                     * uses, make it unusable to userspace.  This
>>> +                     * ensures if we get out to userspace with the
>>> +                     * wrong CR3 value, userspace will crash
>>> +                     * instead of running.
>>> +                     */
>>> +                    pgd.pgd |= _PAGE_NX;
>>> +            }
>>> +    } else if (!pgd.pgd) {
>>> +            /*
>>> +             * We are clearing the PGD and can not check  _PAGE_USER
>>> +             * in the zero'd PGD.
>>
>> Just the argument cannot be checked because it's clearing the entry. The
>> pgd entry itself is not yet modified, so it could be checked.
>
> So, I guess we could enforce that only PGDs with _PAGE_USER set can ever
> be cleared.  That has a nice symmetry to it because we set the shadow
> when we see _PAGE_USER and we would then clear the shadow when we see
> _PAGE_USER.

Is this code path ever hit in any case other than tearing down an LDT?

I'm tempted to suggest that KAISER just disable the MODIFY_LDT config
option for now...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ