[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1511426820.8489.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:47:00 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<sean.wang@...iatek.com>, <airlied@...ux.ie>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<ulrich.hecht+renesas@...il.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] drm/mediatek: mt2701: switch to mfd probing.
Hi, Matthias:
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 09:30 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2017 06:48 AM, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Matthias:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 22:41 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >> With the mtk-mmsys MFD device in place, we switch the probing for
> >> mt2701 from device-tree to mfd.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> >> index dd249cf5121e..5a263aa3ab6e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> >> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
> >> #include <linux/component.h>
> >> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> >> +#include <linux/mfd/mmsys.h>
> >> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> >> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >> @@ -392,9 +393,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = {
> >>
> >> static int mtk_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> + struct mmsys_dev *mmsys_private;
> >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> struct mtk_drm_private *private;
> >> - struct device_node *node;
> >> + struct device_node *node, *parent_node;
> >> struct component_match *match = NULL;
> >> int ret;
> >> int i;
> >> @@ -407,12 +409,23 @@ static int mtk_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> INIT_WORK(&private->commit.work, mtk_atomic_work);
> >> private->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> >>
> >> - private->config_regs = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->of_node);
> >> - if (IS_ERR(private->config_regs))
> >> - return PTR_ERR(private->config_regs);
> >> + /* Check if called from mfd */
> >> + if (!dev->of_node) {
> >> + mmsys_private = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> >
> > Why do you directly access parent's driver data? You just need the
> > device node of mmsys, maybe you could refer to [1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/reset/reset-berlin.c#L78
> >
>
> The difference is, that the driver you mentioned gets probed via device tree
> matching, while we get invoked here through the id_table. So there is no device
> node (the if actually checkes for pdev->dev.of_node to identify exactly this case).
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
Yes, you are right. So
Acked-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
Regards,
CK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists