lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1de051b-837a-3bc1-ed78-8af139ac56ab@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:36:45 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add missing "source" line for firmware subdirectory in
 drivers/Kconfig

Am 28.11.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 11/27/2017 11:12 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> I have a little bit of a hard time to find the right addressee for
>> this patch because there is no maintainer entry for drivers/firmware.
>> Can you apply the following through your tree?
>>
>> Add missing entry for firmware subdirectory in drivers/Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>]
> 
> Hi,
> Why do you need this patch?  You should explain that in the (missing)
> patch description.
> 
> I suppose that it could be done like this, but currently any $ARCH that
> wants to use drivers/firmware/Kconfig does so in the arch/$ARCH/Kconfig file:
> 
> arch> grep firmware/Kconfig */Kconfig
> arm/Kconfig:source "arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig"
> arm/Kconfig:source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
> arm64/Kconfig:source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
> blackfin/Kconfig:source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
> ia64/Kconfig:source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
> mips/Kconfig:source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
> x86/Kconfig:source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
> 
> so all of these would need to be removed.
> 
Thanks for the hints!
Reason is that I received an error report for a patch, and this error report
was about a problem with compiling scpi clk driver with COMPILE_TEST on a
xtensa platform. And the scpi clk driver depends on the scpi driver under
drivers/firmware.
Based on what you explained and after fixing the dependency for the scpi
clk driver the proposed patch shouldn't be needed any longer.

Thanks, Heiner

>> ---
>>  drivers/Kconfig | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/Kconfig b/drivers/Kconfig
>> index 152744c5e..a506867d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/Kconfig
>> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ source "drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig"
>>  
>>  source "drivers/firewire/Kconfig"
>>  
>> +source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
>> +
>>  source "drivers/macintosh/Kconfig"
>>  
>>  source "drivers/net/Kconfig"
>>
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ