linux-kernel - Re: Checkpatch ignores spelling error by using -f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 06 Dec 2017 06:52:34 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Rolf Evers-Fischer <embedded24@...rs-fischer.de>,
        apw@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch ignores spelling error by using -f

On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 15:13 +0100, Rolf Evers-Fischer wrote:
> Hello,
> I've just checked the file drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c, using 
> checkpatch.pl, but I forgot the '-f' option (for file).
> 
> Surprisingly the checkpatch script reported a misspelling:
> 
> "WARNING: 'additionaly' may be misspelled - perhaps 'additionally'?
> #417: 
>          * We enable TRIG_GRANU for RX and TX and additionaly we set"
> 
> Additionally it reported that the file does not appear to be a 
> unified-diff (due to my mistake).
> 
> Running checkpatch again with '-f', it didn't report any problems:
> 
> "drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c has no obvious style problems and is 
> ready for submission."
> 
> Is this a bug in checkpatch.pl? Or is it a feature?

feature.  kinda.

checkpatch reports spelling errors in commit messages.

Without the -f, checkpatch is reading its input as a
commit message before expecting to find a diff/patch.