[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180102143410.13261-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:34:10 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: inside-secure - make function safexcel_try_push_requests static
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The function safexcel_try_push_requests is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
symbol 'safexcel_try_push_requests' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
index 0d685be75241..e3745139644b 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ static int safexcel_hw_init(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv)
}
/* Called with ring's lock taken */
-int safexcel_try_push_requests(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
- int reqs)
+static int safexcel_try_push_requests(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
+ int ring, int reqs)
{
int coal = min_t(int, reqs, EIP197_MAX_BATCH_SZ);
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists