[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6AADFAC011213A4C87B956458587ADB40131FAB5@dggemi507-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 03:56:41 +0000
From: "weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
CC: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"openrisc@...ts.librecores.org" <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] irqchip/ompic: fix return value check in
ompic_of_init()
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 10:41 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:47:19AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > In case of error, the function ioremap() returns NULL pointer not
> > ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check should be
> > replaced with NULL test.
>
> Thanks, I am not sure why I was using the *ERR*() macros. 2 questions:
>
> - How did you notice this?
This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
> - Should I pull this in through my tree or do you have another route? i.e.
> Marc?
Feel free to pull this through your tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists