linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: stmfts,s6sy671

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20180109052331.GC11443@gangnam.samsung>
Date:   Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:23:31 +0900
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: stmfts,s6sy671 - add SPDX identifier

Hi Dmitry,

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 08:49:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 06:57:15PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> > 
> > this is a kind ping, would you also mind giving me a feedback to
> 
> Yes, sorry. Could you please split the patch for each driver
> individually? Also, until we have an update to the CodingStyle doc
> mandating the C++ style comments, I'd prefer keeping the original style
> of comments. So // for the SPDX line and /* */ for the rest.

I was actually following Linus guideline [1] [2]. I also had the
same discussion previously in another context [3].

Please let me know if you still want a mixed style of comments in
the next patch.

Thanks,
Andi

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151163713125320&w=2
    ...
    └-> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151163867325641&w=2
        ...
        └-> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151163867325641&w=2

[2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150964359922353
[3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151312974503109&w=2