linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 2/3] net: mvpp2: Fix clock resource by adding missing mg_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180425135236.24bc0644@bootlin.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:52:36 +0200
From:   Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com, ymarkman@...vell.com,
        mw@...ihalf.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] net: mvpp2: Fix clock resource by adding
 missing mg_core_clk

Hi Gregory,

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:43:14 +0200
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com> wrote:

>Hi Maxime,
> 
> On mer., avril 25 2018, Maxime Chevallier
> <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
>> Marvell's PPv2.2 IP needs an additional clock named "MG Core clock".
>> This is required on Armada 7K and 8K.
>>
>> This commit adds the required clock, updates the devicetree and its
>> documentation accordingly, also fixing a small typo in the
>> marvell-mpp2.txt examples.
>>
>> Fixes: c7e92def1ef4 ("clk: mvebu: cp110: Fix clock tree
>> representation") Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier
>> <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/marvell-pp2.txt          |  9 +++++----
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi        |  5 +++--  
>
>Could you remove the dtsi part and submit it as a separate patch. Then
>I will take care of it.

Ok no problem, I'll split that and re-send it.

Thanks,

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Chevallier, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com