linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility with v4 topology files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180523135609.GK4828@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 14:56:09 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Chintan Patel <chintan.m.patel@...el.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility
 with v4 topology files

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:54:54PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> And I'm wondering whether we should move these definitions to uapi
> headers.

Yes, we should.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)