[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkzY-1z4NBmZECczMisDixgPb2UkJL0k9_LmDNEiqUS1=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:46:22 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Matt Sealey <matt.sealey@....com>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>,
John Horley <john.horley@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] coresight: Fix remote endpoint parsing
On 1 June 2018 at 13:38, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:16:01PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> When parsing the remote endpoint of an output port, we do :
>> rport = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep);
>> rparent = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
>>
>> and then parse the "remote_port" as if it was the remote endpoint,
>> which is wrong. The code worked fine because we used endpoint number
>> as the port number. Let us fix it and optimise a bit as:
>>
>> remote_ep = of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(ep);
>> if (remote_ep)
>> remote_parent = of_graph_get_port_parent(remote_ep);
>>
>> and then, parse the remote_ep for the port/endpoint details.
>>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> index 7c37544..e0deab0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct device *dev,
>> struct device *rdev;
>> struct device_node *ep = NULL;
>> struct device_node *rparent = NULL;
>> - struct device_node *rport = NULL;
>> + struct device_node *rep = NULL;
>>
>> pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!pdata)
>> @@ -169,16 +169,17 @@ of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct device *dev,
>> pdata->outports[i] = endpoint.port;
>>
>> /*
>> - * Get a handle on the remote port and parent
>> - * attached to it.
>> + * Get a handle on the remote endpoint and the device
>> + * it is attached to.
>> */
>> - rparent = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
>> - rport = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep);
>> -
>> - if (!rparent || !rport)
>> + rep = of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(ep);
>> + if (!rep)
>> + continue;
>> + rparent = of_graph_get_port_parent(rep);
>> + if (!rparent)
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (of_graph_parse_endpoint(rport, &rendpoint))
>> + if (of_graph_parse_endpoint(rep, &rendpoint))
>> continue;
>
> You are correct and I'm out to lunch.
>
>>
>> rdev = of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(rparent);
>> @@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct device *dev,
>> return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>
>> pdata->child_names[i] = dev_name(rdev);
>> - pdata->child_ports[i] = rendpoint.id;
>> + pdata->child_ports[i] = rendpoint.port;
>
> You need to do a of_node_put() here for both rep and rparent.
Same thing for the "continue" and error condition above.
>
>>
>> i++;
>> } while (ep);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists