[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeowpZ+OjjWs6-67BOnY=+Nbpn4Bi_Xw3n+NLsELZaptQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:19:38 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: alanx.chiang@...el.com
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, andy.yeh@...el.com,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
tfiga@...omium.org, jcliang@...omium.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: at24: Add address-width property
2018-06-27 7:46 GMT+02:00 <alanx.chiang@...el.com>:
> From: Alan Chiang <alanx.chiang@...el.com>
>
> The AT24 series chips use 8-bit address by default. If some
> chips would like to support more than 8 bits, the at24 driver
> should be added the compatible field for specfic chips.
>
> Provide a flexible way to determine the addressing bits through
> address-width in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Chiang <alanx.chiang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Yeh <andy.yeh@...el.com>
>
> ---
> since v1:
> -- Remove the address-width field in the example.
> since v2:
> -- Remove redundant space.
>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> index 61d833a..aededdb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ Optional properties:
>
> - wp-gpios: GPIO to which the write-protect pin of the chip is connected.
>
> + - address-width: number of address bits (one of 8, 16).
> +
> Example:
>
> eeprom@52 {
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Rob,
we only have two possibilities here and the default is 8 bits.
What do you think about introducing a boolean property here called:
'address-width-16' instead of an integer?
Best regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists