linux-kernel - Re: [RFT PATCH 0/4] usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe sched everywhere

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o9eu1cup.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:59:58 +0300
From:   Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, hminas@...opsys.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/4] usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe sched everywhere

Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> writes:

> While looking at a dwc2 recently, I noticed that some platforms still
> have the uframe scheduler off.  As far as I know, nothing good can
> come out of having the uframe scheduler off.  Let's turn it on
> everywhere.  Assuming this all works out then some time in the future
> we can gut all the old code that handles the old non-uframe scheduler
> and make everything simpler.
>
> NOTE: I don't have access to any of the platforms that I'm changing
> here, so I'm hoping to see a Tested-by from those on the list.
>
>
> Douglas Anderson (4):
>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "bcm" platforms
>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "his" platforms
>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "amlogic" platforms
>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "stm32f4x9_fsotg" platforms

care to resend without RFT prefix and with collected acks, tested-bys, etc?

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)