lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1808211557180.1535@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:57:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Query on skip_onerr field in struct cpuhp_step

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This is about one of field in struct cpuhp_step
> 
> * @skip_onerr: Do not invoke the functions on error rollback
>  *              Will go away once the notifiers are gone
>         bool                    skip_onerr;
> 
> Why this field was introduced, can anyone explain the history behind ? As i
> don't see it being set from anywhere
> 
> If it is specifically was dependent on notifiers, did we missed to remove it
> as the notifiers are gone or the usecase still there?

As the comment says....

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ