[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925112832.GA10951@amd>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:28:32 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Edward Cree <ec429@...tab.net>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.
Hi!
> > I can
> > see how that kind of environment _could_ be implemented with the same
> > code of conduct as a base, but [...] I know I
> > would fight strongly against that.
> It is definitely reassuring to hear you say that.
>
> > There is a list in the first paragraph, but the preceding words say
> > that it should be a *harassment-free experience for everyone*. That
> > part of the paragraph is to me the most important part.
> It certainly _should_ be the most important; IMHO the sentence should end
> after 'everyone'.
>
> > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because of
> > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge by
> > code (or text) alone.
> I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs
> and a Code to be run by humans. And when the author goes on a victory
> lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document", is
> it any surprise I'm worried?
Would you have link on that? I'd really want to know who authored the
document, because it is making statements that are untrue.
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists