lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:28:32 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <>
To:     Edward Cree <>
Cc:     Olof Johansson <>, Jonathan Corbet <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.


> > I can
> > see how that kind of environment _could_ be implemented with the same
> > code of conduct as a base, but [...] I know I
> > would fight strongly against that.
> It is definitely reassuring to hear you say that.
> > There is a list in the first paragraph, but the preceding words say
> > that it should be a *harassment-free experience for everyone*. That
> > part of the paragraph is to me the most important part.
> It certainly _should_ be the most important; IMHO the sentence should end
>  after 'everyone'.
> > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because of
> > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge by
> > code (or text) alone.
> I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs
>  and a Code to be run by humans.  And when the author goes on a victory
>  lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document", is
>  it any surprise I'm worried?

Would you have link on that? I'd really want to know who authored the
document, because it is making statements that are untrue.

(cesky, pictures)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists