[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180928162030.GE19827@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:20:30 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jason@...edaemon.net,
marc.zyngier@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, robh@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, green.hu@...il.com,
Chen Linfei <linfei_chen@...ky.com>,
Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 13/33] csky: Library functions
> +unsigned long long notrace __bswapdi2(unsigned long long u)
> +{
> + return (((u) & 0xff00000000000000ull) >> 56) |
> + (((u) & 0x00ff000000000000ull) >> 40) |
> + (((u) & 0x0000ff0000000000ull) >> 24) |
> + (((u) & 0x000000ff00000000ull) >> 8) |
> + (((u) & 0x00000000ff000000ull) << 8) |
> + (((u) & 0x0000000000ff0000ull) << 24) |
> + (((u) & 0x000000000000ff00ull) << 40) |
> + (((u) & 0x00000000000000ffull) << 56);
> +}
How is this any better than using the generic byteswap helpers?
> +unsigned int notrace __bswapsi2(unsigned int u)
> +{
> + return (((u) & 0xff000000) >> 24) |
> + (((u) & 0x00ff0000) >> 8) |
> + (((u) & 0x0000ff00) << 8) |
> + (((u) & 0x000000ff) << 24);
> +}
Same here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists