[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181003143300.GH32651@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:33:00 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add counter freezing quirk for Goldmont
> There is another variant of model/stepping micro code verification code in
> intel_snb_pebs_broken(). Can we please make this table based and use a
> common function? That's certainly not the last quirk we're going to have.
I have a patch to add a table driven microcode matcher for another fix.
Will post shortly.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists