| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:28:07 -0700
From: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
To: vbadigan@...eaurora.org
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, riteshh@...eaurora.org,
stummala@...eaurora.org, sayali <sayalil@...eaurora.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Re-initialize DLL if MCLK is gated dynamically
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 6:26 AM Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
<vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On few SDHCI-MSM controllers, the host controller's clock tuning
> circuit may go out of sync if controller clocks are gated which
> eventually will result in data CRC, command CRC/timeout errors.
> To overcome this h/w limitation, the DLL needs to be re-initialized
> and restored with its old settings once clocks are ungated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 6918e70..1eb70c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops {
> */
> struct sdhci_msm_variant_info {
> bool mci_removed;
> + bool uses_sdcdc10;
What does that flag mean? Couldn't this just be called something like
restore_dll_config?
> const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops;
> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
> };
> @@ -264,6 +265,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
> u32 vmmc_level[2];
> bool vqmmc_load;
> u32 vqmmc_level[2];
> + bool uses_sdcdc10_dll;
> + bool restore_sdr_dll_cfg;
restore_sdr_dll_cfg appears to not be used.
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -1031,6 +1034,36 @@ static int sdhci_msm_hs400_dll_calibration(struct sdhci_host *host)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int sdhci_msm_restore_sdr_dll_config(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct mmc_ios ios = host->mmc->ios;
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * SDR DLL comes into picure only if clock frequency is greater than
> + * 100MHz. And its needed only for SDR104, HS200 and HS400 cards.
> + * Its not needed for HS400es cards.
> + */
> + if (host->clock <= CORE_FREQ_100MHZ ||
> + !(ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 ||
> + ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200 ||
> + ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) ||
> + ios.enhanced_strobe)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Reset the tuning block */
> + ret = msm_init_cm_dll(host);
Is this reinit required? It's kind of meaty.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Restore the tuning block */
> + ret = msm_config_cm_dll_phase(host, msm_host->saved_tuning_phase);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int sdhci_msm_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> {
> struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> @@ -1075,7 +1108,6 @@ static int sdhci_msm_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> - msm_host->saved_tuning_phase = phase;
> rc = mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL);
> if (!rc) {
> /* Tuning is successful at this tuning point */
> @@ -1100,6 +1132,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> rc = msm_config_cm_dll_phase(host, phase);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> + msm_host->saved_tuning_phase = phase;
> dev_dbg(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: Setting the tuning phase to %d\n",
> mmc_hostname(mmc), phase);
> } else {
> @@ -1807,19 +1840,39 @@ static int sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_mci_var = {
> .mci_removed = false,
> + .uses_sdcdc10 = false,
> + .var_ops = &mci_var_ops,
> + .offset = &sdhci_msm_mci_offset,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_mci_sdcdc10_var = {
> + .mci_removed = false,
> + .uses_sdcdc10 = true,
> .var_ops = &mci_var_ops,
> .offset = &sdhci_msm_mci_offset,
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_v5_var = {
> .mci_removed = true,
> + .uses_sdcdc10 = false,
> + .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
> + .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_v5_sdcdc10_var = {
> + .mci_removed = true,
> + .uses_sdcdc10 = true,
> .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
> .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id sdhci_msm_dt_match[] = {
> {.compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4", .data = &sdhci_msm_mci_var},
> + {.compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4-sdcdc10",
> + .data = &sdhci_msm_mci_sdcdc10_var},
> {.compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5", .data = &sdhci_msm_v5_var},
> + {.compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5-sdcdc10",
> + .data = &sdhci_msm_v5_sdcdc10_var},
> {},
> };
>
> @@ -1880,6 +1933,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> var_info = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> msm_host->mci_removed = var_info->mci_removed;
> + msm_host->uses_sdcdc10_dll = var_info->uses_sdcdc10;
> msm_host->var_ops = var_info->var_ops;
> msm_host->offset = var_info->offset;
>
> @@ -2124,9 +2178,18 @@ static int sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + int ret;
>
> - return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
> msm_host->bulk_clks);
It might be nicer to just put an if (ret) return ret; here, instead of
rolling it into the next conditional.
> + /*
> + * Whenever core-clock is gated dynamically, it's needed to
> + * restore the SDR DLL settings when the clock is ungated.
> + */
> + if (!ret && msm_host->uses_sdcdc10_dll && msm_host->clk_rate)
> + ret = sdhci_msm_restore_sdr_dll_config(host);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> #endif
>
> --
> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists