linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] CPU clock changes for Tegra20/30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <153972894990.5275.3681567642363374941@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:29:09 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] CPU clock changes for Tegra20/30

Quoting Dmitry Osipenko (2018-08-30 12:20:42)
> Hello,
> 
> This series is a prerequisite for the CPUFREQ driver patches, it can be
> applied separately. CPUFREQ will be supported on Tegra30 once this and
> the CPUFREQ patch-series will be applied.
> 

Will anyone from Nvidia or Tegra review these patches? I'd rather not
apply something that has had zero review.