linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: rtl8188eu: change return type of rtw_hal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:57:55 +0100
From:   Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: rtl8188eu: change return type of
 rtw_hal_xmit()

On 10/28/18 1:08 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 15:57 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 22:28 +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
>>> The function rtw_hal_xmit() returns true or false.
>>> Change the return type from s32 to bool.
>> []
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188eu_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188eu_xmit.c
>> []
>>> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ bool rtl8188eu_xmitframe_complete(struct adapter *adapt,
>>>    *	true	dump packet directly
>>>    *	false	enqueue packet
>>>    */
>>> -s32 rtw_hal_xmit(struct adapter *adapt, struct xmit_frame *pxmitframe)
>>> +bool rtw_hal_xmit(struct adapter *adapt, struct xmit_frame *pxmitframe)
>>>   {
>>>   	s32 res;
>>
>> Does "s32 res" need changing to bool too?
> 
> Perhaps all the functions regardless of types
> with returns of only _SUCCESS and _FAIL could be
> converted to bool.
> 

"s32 res" is not used for return value, so it does not need changing to bool.
But it could be converted too.

I'll keep that, and converting functions only returning _SUCCESS and _FAIL to
bool, in mind for future patches. Thanks.

Perhaps _SUCCESS / _FAIL could be replaced with true / false throughout the
driver to get rid of the defines? Or is that a bad idea?

Regards,
Michael