[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810281031520.2471@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 10:32:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 03/13] x86/speculation: Add static key for Enhanced
IBRS
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
> On 10/26/2018 09:58 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> @@ -386,6 +389,7 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void)
> >> /* Force it so VMEXIT will restore correctly */
> >> x86_spec_ctrl_base |= SPEC_CTRL_IBRS;
> >> wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);
> >> + static_branch_enable(&spectre_v2_enhanced_ibrs);
> >> goto specv2_set_mode;
> >> }
> >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RETPOLINE))
> >
> > Why you need a static key for enhanced IBRS? It is supposed to be set at
> > boot time and never get changed after that. It will be easier to use a
> > feature bit for that instead. We usually use static key when the value
> > can be changed at run time.
> >
>
> We're close to running out of the feature bits. So I'm trying not to
> use those.
Software feature bits can be extended when needed. That's really a non issue.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists