[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117154821.GC9094@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:57:39AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
> I wanted to test this patch (and try to benchmark having the "mov x9,
> x30" always present in function prelude vs having two nops), but I
> cannot get this patch to apply (despite having a version including both
> commits below).
>
> Could you provide a git branch from which I could try to rebase the
> patch? (Or a new version of the series)
It also applies with just a single, harmless fuzz 1 onto 5.0-rc2.
Does that help?
I'm currently over v7, with Mark's requests included and the mov patching
done only once at bootup...
Torsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists