[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117165052.6d1f1a58@xps13>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:50:52 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add suspend/resume
callbacks
Hi Andrew, Vivien,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com> wrote on Thu, 17 Jan 2019
10:46:41 -0500:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:23:29 +0100, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > Hi Florian
> >
> > > A possible approach could be to call the port_disable, port_enable
> > > callbacks from dsa_slave_suspend() and dsa_slave_resume(), I might have
> > > some patches doing that already somewhere.
> >
> > I expect it is also on Viviens TODO list, since this really could be
> > in the core.
>
> Indeed that is!
So, shall I wait for Vivien's patches (adding port_disable/enable()
in dsa_slave_suspend/resume()) and keep the driver as-is or do you want
me to manually call port_disable/enable() from the mv88e6xxx driver?
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists